Skip to content
MEET SONIAI / GTM consultant + product builder
← All selected work

Case study 06 / Commercial analytics / Synthetic-data modelling

Myntra Returns & Assortment Profitability

Independent analysis

Understanding what returns do to marketplace profitability.

An analytical model of return behaviour, reverse logistics and subsidy allocation in a synthetic fashion-commerce dataset.

Editorial illustration of the project’s focus.

01 / Context

The problem

Revenue can hide the effect of returns, repeat return behaviour, restocking and subsidy allocation on retained profit.

02 / Ownership

My contribution

Analysed return behaviour, assortment and modeled subsidy leakage across approximately 119K synthetic records.

The analytical scope

  • Return-adjusted and assortment-level profitability.
  • Serial-return patterns and subsidy allocation.
  • Reverse-demand optimisation and restocking cycles.

How to interpret the model

The analysis explores how changing return behaviour and operating assumptions can affect profitability. Any opportunity identified belongs to the synthetic exercise, rather than a verified company result.

The business decision

Evaluate revenue alongside retained margin and the cost of serving returns. A return policy or subsidy decision needs its own behavioural assumptions and operational constraints.

Dataset & analytical context

Reading the analysis

Synthetic dataset records
119,143

Data rows in the supplied synthetic workbook, excluding its header. Records are not the same measure as unique orders.

Modelled aggregate return cost
≈₹35.69 lakh

The return-cost total in the supplied SQL summary. This is not an identified subsidy-leakage amount or an actual company cost.

The idea to carry forward

Revenue is not the same as retained profit. Return behaviour can fundamentally change marketplace economics.

Synthetic dataset. Not official Myntra internal data, verified company performance, a client engagement or realised company savings.